Shocking sound (in a good way) for this money and in this size
I see no reason to do Bi-Fig on them
Before the purchase of tusks, he was content with the 1979 Technics three, and thought that there should not be less than three lanes in human acoustics. The purchase of tusks was spontaneous, but not thoughtless. I do not know what the engineers do with this company, but you definitely do not expect such a sound from these paintings. By sound:
1. The bass is enough, definitely. It is deep, voluminous, without busting (for a room in 30 squares, no longer needs),
2. Definitely a chip of acoustics in the middle and tops due to the use of Twitter from senior acoustics. The top of the purest (probably only in electrostats, but this is another price league), but at the same time remain juicy.
3. The scene is large for this size and form factor.
4. A very successful ligament with an amplifier of Quad Vena II, which was confirmed by both consultants and more perverted Hi-End ears. At the same time, the ligament plays better than the older 606.
Bottom line: for your money - the best proposal (which is confirmed by a bunch of awards at exhibitions and many reviews).
Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews
Bowers & Wilkins believes that the perfect loudspeaker shouldn’t add to or take away from the original music. Instead, it should reveal the ‘True Sound’ of the performance, faithful in every nuance to the original – exactly as the artist intended. It’s this dedication to audio excellence that has seen us deliver category-defining innovation for every decade of our existence – and it’s also why Bowers & Wilkins is revered and respected by the professionals who know sound best.
Find out more about Bowers & Wilkins